TL;DR
Get health and wellness essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Sixty and Me article by sports scientist and trainer Patricia Siegel argues that women over 60 should include both endurance and strength exercise rather than choosing one. It offers a sample weekly routine, but the recommendations are the author’s guidance; individual ability, health conditions and safe exercise choices remain important.
Women over 60 should not have to choose between cardio and strength training, according to a Sixty and Me exercise guide by sports scientist and personal trainer Patricia Siegel. The article recommends combining endurance work with resistance exercise and, where safe, impact activity, while presenting its schedule as guidance rather than a plan tailored to every person.
Siegel’s proposed endurance routine includes Zone 2 exercise twice a week, for about 35 to 45 minutes per session. She describes this as a conversational pace: someone exercising should be able to speak a few sentences but not sing. Walking can be an accessible starting point, she writes, but the activity may need to become faster or more challenging as fitness improves.
The guide also recommends interval training once or twice weekly, alternating harder efforts with recovery. For beginners, Siegel suggests roughly 30 seconds of hard effort followed by a minute of easier movement, repeated four or five times. For resistance work, she proposes three sessions per week, with progressive increases in weight, repetitions, sets or movement tempo. Her example is three to four sets of 10 to 12 repetitions, stopping with about two repetitions still possible.
For bone-loading activity, the article lists heel drops, skips, hops and jumps as possible additions to strength-training days, if they can be performed safely. Its sample week alternates lower- and upper-body strength sessions with two Zone 2 sessions and one interval day, followed by a rest day. This is the author’s suggested structure, not a clinical assessment of an individual reader’s needs.
Why Combining Exercise Matters
The article’s central point is that endurance and strength serve different roles and should not be treated as competing choices. It links endurance activity with cardiovascular fitness and resistance exercise with maintaining muscle and providing a stimulus to bones. That distinction matters to older readers looking for a routine that supports more than one aspect of physical function.
The source cites U.S. figures to show that many older adults do not meet both types of activity guidelines. In 2022, 13.9% of Americans aged 65 and older met both aerobic and muscle-strengthening guidelines during leisure time, according to the figures included in the article. The reported proportion was 16.8% for ages 65 to 74, 12.3% for ages 75 to 84 and 6.2% for those 85 and older. These figures describe guideline participation, not the effect of Siegel’s particular program.
For readers, the practical implication is to think about how a routine balances activities, rather than assuming walking alone or lifting weights alone addresses every fitness goal. The guide’s examples can help frame that discussion, but exercise intensity and impact work may need adjustment based on a person’s health, mobility and experience.
Products Worth Considering
Oral-B iO Series 9 Limited Rechargeable Electric Toothbrush with 7 Cleaning Modes
Therabody Theragun Mini 3rd Generation Massage Gun, Black
Therabody SmartGoggles 2nd Gen Heated Eye and Temple Massager
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Exercise Plan in Context
Siegel says she is writing a forthcoming Johns Hopkins book, The Menopause Strength and Endurance Training Blueprint, scheduled for spring 2028. The Sixty and Me article presents her approach as a way to address confusion about exercise in midlife and later life. The provided source material does not include independent review of the recommendations or a detailed account of how the suggested schedule was developed.
The article also cites two health statistics: cardiovascular disease kills more women in the United States than all forms of cancer combined, and about one in two women over 50 will break a bone because of osteoporosis. Those are claims and figures reported in the source article; the supplied material does not identify the underlying studies or agencies. They offer broad context, but do not establish that any particular exercise schedule will prevent heart disease or fractures.
Siegel’s plan uses a mix of moderate endurance, intervals and progressive resistance. Its talk test is a simple way to describe effort, but it does not replace individualized advice about exercise intensity, especially for people with medical conditions, pain, balance concerns or a history of injury.
“During the exercise you would be able to speak a few sentences but won’t be able to sing.”
— Patricia Siegel, describing Zone 2 exercise in Sixty and Me
Limits of the Suggested Routine
The article does not establish that its sample schedule is suitable for every woman over 60. The supplied material gives no individualized screening criteria, modifications for specific conditions, or detail on how readers should assess whether jumping, skipping or harder intervals are safe for them. It also does not provide an independent clinical evaluation of the recommendations.
The source does not state the publication date of the guide, identify the sources for the heart disease and osteoporosis statistics, or explain whether the sample plan has been tested as a complete program. Its exercise suggestions should not be read as medical advice or as a guarantee of preventing disease, muscle loss or fractures. Readers with health or mobility concerns can ask a qualified health professional about appropriate activity and adaptations.
Book and Guidance Still Ahead
Siegel says her book, The Menopause Strength and Endurance Training Blueprint, is due in spring 2028. The source provides no further publication details or evidence that the book will add clinical guidance beyond the article’s outline.
For now, the reported development is the publication of an exercise guide and its proposed weekly structure. Any more specific recommendations would depend on a reader’s circumstances; the article does not announce new official exercise guidelines or a change in public health policy.
Key Questions
Does the article recommend cardio or strength training for women over 60?
It recommends both endurance exercise and strength training, rather than choosing one. Siegel also suggests adding bone-loading activity when it can be done safely.
How much endurance exercise does the guide suggest?
Siegel suggests two Zone 2 sessions of about 35 to 45 minutes each per week, plus interval training once or twice weekly. These are the author’s recommendations, not a personalized prescription.
What is the talk test for Zone 2 exercise?
The guide describes a conversational pace: you should be able to speak a few sentences but not sing. It presents this as a practical way to gauge effort during steady endurance exercise.
Does the plan say walking is enough?
Walking is described as a useful starting point. Siegel says that if someone adapts to the same pace, they may need to increase the pace, choose more challenging terrain or change activity. The article does not say walking is unsuitable.
Is the sample routine appropriate for everyone?
No individual assessment is included in the article. People with health conditions, balance or mobility concerns, pain, or uncertainty about impact exercise can consult a qualified health professional about safe options.
Source: rss
